A March Election?

There is speculation that the General Election might be held in March of next year, rather than the expected May or June dates. There are a number of clues that this is being taken seriously by the Conservatives at least.

The thinking is that it would avoid Gordon Brown having to put a vote-killing (for Labour) Budget forward before the election. As always, Brown is thinking only of himself, his own position and his party and their (hidden) agenda.

I am sure that the thinking (possibly promoted by Mandelson) is a "damage limitation" exercise to avoid a virtual wipe-out of Labour from the House of Commons once the long-delayed but no longer avoidable "crisis budget" were to emerge. Now that the Lisbon Treaty is about to come into force, next months, there is no longer any reason to hold out on the election — except, of course, to cling onto power as long as one can, for personal and ideological reasons, short of scuppering the chances of the less obviously threatened Labour-held seats' candidates.

Therefore, in Brown's (and Mandelson's) typical cold, calculating, self-serving eyes, next March seems to offer the best time to go to the country from their own standpoint — which is all that matters to either of them, as has now become so very obvious. Indeed, Brown is still pursuing his "scorched Earth policy" as he has no interest in Britain as such, and never has!

With the release of the translations of that former KGB agent's diaries, with the promise of more to come, there has now become a good (from Labour's viewpoint) reason to go earlier than originally planned, before too much more damage is done by later revelations. I imagine they know the expected timetable for later disclosures and are factoring that info into their calculations.

When one is dealing with a totally corrupt administration, as seems to be almost certainly the case in Britain today, one has to understand the way they think; and all the above does fit into that way of thinking, based on the various factors involved. I'd put quite a high level of credence on this (at present merely a) rumour. Clearly the Conservatives already do.

Of course, there is still the possibility of Labour generating a reason to invoke the Civil Contingencies Act and thereby suspend Parliament and elections indefinitely. The most likely cause of (or excuse for) that at the moment is the legally-enforced Swine Flu "poison" jabs that now appear to be nothing less than a Bilderberg-devised plot for mass murder of our people — a worldwide initiative, but we need to concentrate on how it would probably be handled here in Britain.

The mass deaths (thought to be intended to reach four or five billion people) that one might assume are intended to occur after the inoculation programme is complete (it's probably a two-part poison, with the second ingredient to be released into the air or water once it is known that the jabs have all been done) would be a very convenient opportunity to declare a state of emergency. See this video…



There are other irons in the fire, that have been around for some time, such as the alleged social engineering of British society via mass immigration, so as to produce tensions within communities and result in riots to be quelled by militia prepared to fire on British citizens. All of it — all of it — is designed to bring about the destruction of our essentially democratic society, which is why ministers have been talking about "the post-democratic age" in some places for a while now, as has been documented here and there, I have noticed.

Perhaps the best news is that, if attempts to generate a suitable emergency situation fail or can be postponed, at least we'd have only four months or so that we need to hold out until that vitally important election next March, rather than the six or seven months originally anticipated.

As a nation we need to do that, or all could be lost. We owe it to our children and our fellows to make sure that nothing this Labour government and its cronies might do to undermine our nation actually succeeds.

Not too long now…

Cameron Interview

There has been yet another interview with David Cameron in the print media. We don't want too many of these, though it is important to have some, to provide insight into the character of the man who could well be our next Prime Minister.

This one, by Geordie Greig at the London Evening Standard, is useful as far as it goes, though it is a little less substantial than one or two of the others we've already had.

It's definitely worth reading, but is more about the man's character than about policies, which is of course just as important for a potential elected (as distinct from the Monarchy) de facto Head of State.

Communism Within Britain

There is a fascinating article in the Mail today, based on what has been found in a former Soviet Union KGB agent's diary. In fact, I'd go further: it is dynamite! Of course, it isn't being covered by the BBC…

The meticulous records of former KGB agent Anatoly Chernyaev have revealed what a lot of us now realise anyway: the control of the British Labour Party from the Kremlin and the infiltration of the Trades Unions and various public sector bodies — something I have mentioned myself on several occasions, here and elsewhere.

UPDATE: Prompted by Ross in the comments here, I have now found Fraser Nelson's (well worth reading) article on this, as well as the Peter Oborne and Gerald Kaufman ones Ross mentioned. All these three are at the Spectator, who seem to have led on this but have far fewer comments!

It comes as no surprise to me to read of the documented collusion between this man and Michael Foot and Neil Kinnock is dealing with Mrs Thatcher — indeed, it was broadly assumed to be the case by a number of those of us who were more "on the inside" of central government during those years.

What is more significant today than history is, as the Mail puts it:

"But more worrying, perhaps, is the fact that the document shows in stark detail how the political ideology of so many of those who govern us today was shaped by the unspeakable communist creed of the Soviet Union.

The unpalatable truth is that many ministers in Government today rose through the ranks of a British socialist movement that was heavily influenced - and even controlled - by the Kremlin in Moscow."

It has long been known that many current and former Labour ministers who have held office during even part of the past twelve years are former Communists or have admitted to Communist (or, perhaps, communitarian in some cases) leanings. Others are still "unknowns" in that regard.

The article is quite long, but definitely worth going through in its entirety. Older readers will recognise some of the names mentioned, such as Jack Jones (not the singer!) and Ron Hayward, and will no doubt be very interested in what is disclosed about them. For some these will be revelations, for others I suspect they will merely confirm long-held suspicions — especially about their treasonous acts and desire to transform Britain, even then, into a Communist society with an unelected "party leader" running the country.

Thus we see that what is going on in our country today, via "New" Labour, Common Purpose and the EU, is only a repeat of what has been worked towards before. It is pleasing to read in the comments to that article (70 of them as I write this) that most readers have realised that "New Labour" has been deliberately wrecking the British economy for years — the current crisis adding a further one-and-a-half trillion Pounds to our national debt.

The real lesson to learn from all this is that, even if the current attempts to transform our nation into a demolished province of the "EUSSR" (as some are calling it) are defeated this time, it will not stop those subversives and all who follow in their treacherous footsteps doing the same again, in another manner, just as secretively via infiltration and subversion.

We shall never be able to rest from our alertness, and we shall have to teach our children well, to make sure their generation isn't caught napping.

Goa'uld for dinner

I always though chipolatas were little things — but not at our local butcher. They look to me rather like larval-stage Goa'uld (i.e. before the hood and fins grow).

Anyway, they were excellent, and went well with a couple of rashers of bacon on a bed of rice, with a small side dish of mushrooms and tomato.

The New USSR

Mr Not-A-Sheep has yet again tracked down some very truthful and informed reporting, this time from Pravda of all places. The once highly-suspect organ of the former USSR is these days far more open and honest in its reporting — and of course it has intimate knowledge of how the Soviet Union operated.

Here are a couple of short extracts from the quoted article, which is well worth reading in its entirety, or even just Mr Not-A-Sheep's selection; but these few snippets certainly offer a flavour. First is this:

Similarities between the Lisbon Treaty and its communist predecessors are quite remarkable, for instance in the clauses on equality before the law.

…then this:

As a matter of fact, there are so many similarities between the old Soviet Union and the EU that mere coincidence is unlikely. [Vladimir] Bukovsky argues the EU was designed to be like the old USSR. The architects of the EU? Mostly social democrats, whom Stalin quite aptly called “Social Fascists.”

Finally, looking to the (probably quite near) future:

By that time, all Europeans except for the privileged class of “eurocrats” will be prisoners in the EU. However, they will certainly have a wonderful Constitution.

The word pravda means "truth"; and these days the publication of that name can and does indeed publish truth. We really need to get our country back on its feet quickly enough to be able to step away from this montrosity called the European Union before it's too late, even though it won't be something that can be done immediately without harming ourselves as a trading nation, as I have just this week hinted (and, in view of discussions elsewhere, might as well be divulged, at least the headline policy).

We must shift enough of our trade substantially away from EU member States that are likely to ditch us for fellow member nations as buyers of our goods, so that the damage done by pulling out of the EU will by then be able to be contained and managed. There are ways to encourage our exporters to do so; and the sooner our level of dependency upon such EU nations can be reduced sufficiently, the better it will be for Britain.

I thought it would probably take a full parliamentary term under the Conservatives (no-one else, by the way!) realistically, to reach the point where the proposal to withdraw could be put to the people in a Referendum (at last we'd get one!) and the best part of a year to deal with that and — assuming a "withdraw" consensus — do the actual legal stuff and get us out.

My basis was on knowledge gained during my time in the then DTI and from other sources. It would delight me no end if it were feasible to achieve this outcome in a much shorter timescale; but I have a whole range of plans to keep the wolf from our door in the meantime, if it should take as long as I envisage. Those are not going to made public!

Now perhaps those who seemed to be lumping me in with "untrsutworthy politicians and parties" (or something along those lines) will realise where my motivations lie, and why I have applied intelligence to my own plans of action rather than falling into the fear-and-anger trap that The Anti-Terrorist cautions us to avoid.

Newmania on Cameron and the EU

the sometimes-undervalued Newmania has posted what I consider a definitive comment at Labour-supporting Hopi Sen's 'blog, whom he describes as "doctrinally diabolical" but also "a terrific commentator". Here's his comment on the David Cameron/EU business, as reproduced at his own 'blog:

When Cameron promised a referendum on the Treaty it was in the expectation of Brown calling an election. It was in other words ; real. He deserves credit for this and only the left are pretending it meant more. Taken together with leaving the Federalist group (and thereby eliciting gratifying squeals from the Guardian sorority) he is by far the most Euro sceptic PM in waiting we have ever had. This poses a challenge to Labour internationalism as does the rise of the BNP and the growing anger about immigration, the loathing of multiculturalism and much more. Your “Its all a game of media chess” shtick is hopelessly out of touch . You have become the anti British party of Britain and that’s a seriously tough gig.

In a nutshell!

Hawkins Flyover — The Video

Here is a link to a computer-generated vision of the view once the Sir John Hawkins Flyover has gone and all the work there completed. Looks much better to me!

Europe and the Conservatives

The news this past day and evening has been an apparently poor statement from David Cameron on Britain and the EU, and Dan Hannan's stepping down from his recently-begun position as legal affairs pokesman for the Conservatives within the European Parliament.

I have a whole panorama of thoughts about all of this; but I am not going to make any of it public, for fear of tipping-off the European bureaucrats who are working to eliminate national democracies.

All I shall say at this time is that we should all be alert to the strategic implications of how this issue needs to be handled, and I also see a greater rôle for local Conservative Party members in ensuring that the strategy is followed-through during the next six to eight years (for that is how long it will take, altogether) via internal monitoring of and — when and where necessary — pressure on the party leadership.

If we play it properly, and ignore those monomaniacs who are still pressing for a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty (which would be pointless and end up being an own goal), we can get our country back. It won't happen tomorrow, or even next year; but — as G'Kar put it so eloquently — "though it take a thousand years, we will be free!"

In our case, it should take less than a hundredth of that time, thankfully; but it needs to be played well and intelligently. In private I could easily outline the path I perceive we need to take — but that's not for public consumption, for fear of scuppering what might end up being our only chance to regain control of our own destiny rather than having it dictated by a huge Communitarian organisation.

This needs the trust that those who know me well enough will grant (though a few of them can be very argumentative!) but, as the alternative is almost certain to be near-enough permanent (and definitely long-term) loss of our sovereignty, I hope that others' egos and monomanias can be put to one side for the sake of saving our nation.

This isn't anything to do with Dan Hannan, who is an important part of what needs to follow, operating almost independently of the party leadership. That needs to be allowed to press ahead, not in opposition to David Cameron and his team but as a complementary part of the genuine "broad church" that is the Conservative Party. Indeed, this is the only party in British politics that can save us from the EU dictatorial threat, bar none. That is beyond debate — it is a simple (and actually quite obvious when one thinks about it seriously and properly) fact.

If and (probably) only if they do that, we can yet prevail. Anything else merely plays into the hands of the unelected oligarchy at Brussels, and their masters behind them. Now is the time, more than ever before, to avoid their traps!